The Brief
What You Need to Know. No More, No Less.
How to Challenge Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Massachusetts
When a lawyer’s mistakes affect the outcome of a case, Massachusetts law provides a remedy. This post explains how these claims are brought and what evidence is required.
Every defendant in Massachusetts has the right to competent legal representation. When a lawyer’s mistakes are so serious that they affect the outcome of the case, that is called ineffective assistance of counsel. It is one of the most common post-conviction claims and can result in a new trial or reduced sentence.
To succeed on this claim, you must show that your attorney’s performance fell below the standard expected of a reasonably skilled lawyer and that those errors likely changed the result of your case. Examples include failing to file key motions, not investigating witnesses, overlooking evidence, or giving incorrect advice about a plea. Sometimes the problem is not strategy but neglect, such as failing to meet deadlines or prepare for trial.
In Massachusetts, these claims are usually raised in a motion for new trial. The motion is supported by affidavits, documents, or testimony explaining what went wrong. Judges may hold an evidentiary hearing to decide whether the mistakes were serious enough to require a new trial.
The standard for evaluating ineffective assistance is flexible. Massachusetts courts use the “substantial likelihood of a miscarriage of justice” test, which gives judges discretion to correct unfair results even if the errors were not obvious at trial. This makes the state’s approach more protective than the federal standard.
If you suspect your lawyer’s performance contributed to your conviction, it’s important to act quickly. Reviewing the record with an experienced appellate attorney can help identify whether a valid claim exists and what steps to take next.
How Does the Criminal Appeals Process Work in Massachusetts?
An appeal isn’t a new trial, it’s a review of what went wrong the first time. This post explains how appeals move through the Massachusetts court system and what issues can be raised.
The criminal appeals process in Massachusetts allows defendants to challenge legal errors that may have occurred during trial or sentencing. An appeal is not a new trial. It is a review of what happened in the lower court to determine whether the law was applied correctly and fairly.
The process begins when you file a notice of appeal within thirty days of the judgment or sentence. After that, the trial transcripts and other parts of the record are prepared and sent to the Appeals Court. Once the record is complete, both sides file written briefs explaining their arguments. The defendant’s brief points out the specific errors that may have affected the verdict, and the prosecutor’s brief argues why the conviction should stand.
In some cases, the Appeals Court will schedule oral argument. This gives each side a chance to discuss the case before a panel of judges and answer questions about their legal positions. The judges then issue a written decision that either upholds the conviction, reverses it, or sends the case back for additional proceedings in the trial court.
If you lose in the Appeals Court, you can file an Application for Further Appellate Review asking the Supreme Judicial Court to take your case. The SJC selects only a small number of cases each year, focusing on those that raise new or important legal questions. Even if review is denied, the appellate process ensures that serious errors are corrected and that defendants receive a fair trial under the law.
Appeals are time-sensitive and highly technical, but they play a critical role in protecting constitutional rights. If you believe your case was decided unfairly, an experienced appellate attorney can review the record and help determine whether there are strong issues for appeal.